From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pA36tT43242929 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:55:29 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id ACF361CDD227 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PHJCrHHco6G74ofu for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:55:25 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests 264: add a copy and reserve test Message-ID: <20111103065525.GA6800@infradead.org> References: <4EB20505.7070005@cn.fujitsu.com> <4EB205C7.6010906@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB205C7.6010906@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: WuBo Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Btrfs , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:08:55AM +0800, WuBo wrote: > This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small files > into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk is > not full under kenerl 3.0 with intel64. It seems like you really want to use _scratch_mkfs_sized instead of the btrfs-specific resize option and make the test generic. Also we already have used up these test numbers in the xfstests-dev repository, and I will commit another batch of tests today. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs