From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] xfs: serialise unaligned direct IOs
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 03:02:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111103070246.GA10579@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADDb1s0WUfvt8N+hMATboKxbMUZdk2N-R2e=KFH2JvGUjbigBg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:37:03AM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
> This is needed for long term kernel 2.6.35.14.
> Please let me know for any changes/suggestions.
It sounds like a fine candidate to backport, although the context
differs a lot from the actual changes commited to mainline. A few
comments below:
> they are overlapping IO and the result of concurrent overlapping IOs
> is undefined - the result of either IO is a valid result so we let
> them race. Hence we only penalise unaligned IO, which already has a
> major overhead compared to aligned IO so this isn't a major problem.
>
You probably should keep the original Signoff and reviewed-by tags,
and add your editor note on the top into [ ] brackets.
> + if (!need_i_mutex && ( unaligned_io || mapping->nrpages || pos >
> ip->i_size)) {
no space after the opening brace please, and split overly-long lines
into two:
if (!need_i_mutex &&
(unaligned_io || mapping->nrpages || pos > ip->i_size)) {
> if (need_i_mutex) {
> - /* demote the lock now the cached pages are gone */
> - xfs_ilock_demote(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> + if (unaligned_io)
> + xfs_ioend_wait(ip);
> + /* demote the lock now the cached pages are gone if we can */
> + else {
> + xfs_ilock_demote(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> + iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
> + }
Please use the comment that was used upstream here:
/*
* If we are doing unaligned IO, wait for all other IO
* to drain, otherwise demote the lock if we had to
* flush cached pages.
*/
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>
> - iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
> need_i_mutex = 0;
You also need to make the i_mutex unlock and need_i_mutex update
conditional here, otherwise you still serialize all O_DIRECT writes.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-03 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-03 6:07 [Patch] xfs: serialise unaligned direct IOs Amit Sahrawat
2011-11-03 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-11-03 9:59 ` Amit Sahrawat
2011-11-03 10:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03 11:19 ` Amit Sahrawat
2011-12-12 14:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-14 8:57 ` Amit Sahrawat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111103070246.GA10579@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox