From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pA8H4r4T134590 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:04:56 -0600 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:04:46 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions Message-ID: <20111108170446.GA17399@infradead.org> References: <1320342953-7973-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <1320342953-7973-6-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20111107132533.GP12759@twin.jikos.cz> <87sjm0kqjk.fsf@dmbot.sw.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sjm0kqjk.fsf@dmbot.sw.ru> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dmitry Monakhov Cc: tytso@mit.edu, xfs@oss.sgi.com, dave@jikos.cz, aelder@sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:31:11PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Have you recompile fsstress via make? > test explicitly want use new feature "-f setattr=1" Btw, one useful thing for these patches would be to clearly error out if fsstress does't recognize the option. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs