From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pA8HItB8135683 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:18:55 -0600 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:19:08 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [BUG] assert in xfs_imap_to_bp, line 185 Message-ID: <20111108171908.GN20464@sgi.com> References: <20111108163932.GA22095@sgi.com> <20111108170606.GA17457@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111108170606.GA17457@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:06:07PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:39:32AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > Hi XFS Folks, > > > > I am able to hit this assert consistently when running test 111 on recent > > (commit 9e4c109a) oss xfs bits: > > That's expected - the test must only be run on non-debug kernels. It > corrupt the inode, and then we read it. A normal kernel shouldn't > panic, but for the debug kernel we settled on an assert for it. > > I'm not sure it's a smart idea, and WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO might be > better in the end. Thanks Christoph! Sorry for the extra noise.. I'll remember use the 'auto' group next time. -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs