xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion

xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion

[Wanlong Gao]

v3.1.0-10325-g3155521

[   39.315513] XFS: Assertion failed: XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount) || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_super.c, line: 799
[   39.316613] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   39.317099] kernel BUG at fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:101!
[   39.317554] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP 
[   39.317554] CPU 1 
[   39.317554] Modules linked in: xfs exportfs deflate zlib_deflate ctr camellia cast5 rmd160 crypto_null ccm serpent blowfish_generic blowfish_common twofish_x86_64 twofish_common ecb xcbc cbc sha256_generic sha512_generic des_generic cryptd aes_x86_64 aes_generic ah6 ah4 esp6 esp4 xfrm4_mode_beet xfrm4_tunnel tunnel4 xfrm4_mode_tunnel xfrm4_mode_transport xfrm6_mode_transport xfrm6_mode_ro xfrm6_mode_beet xfrm6_mode_tunnel ipcomp ipcomp6 xfrm_ipcomp xfrm6_tunnel tunnel6 af_key sunrpc ipv6 snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore microcode i2c_piix4 snd_page_alloc virtio_net virtio_balloon i2c_core pcspkr joydev virtio_blk floppy virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio [last unloaded: speedstep_lib]
[   39.317554] 
[   39.317554] Pid: 2572, comm: umount Not tainted 3.1.0-10325-g3155521 #1 Red Hat KVM
[   39.317554] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02f52ea>]  [<ffffffffa02f52ea>] assfail+0x22/0x24 [xfs]
[   39.317554] RSP: 0018:ffff88001d369d48  EFLAGS: 00010296
[   39.317554] RAX: 000000000000008d RBX: ffff88001d658d90 RCX: 000000000000aaf7
[   39.317554] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: 0000000000000246
[   39.317554] RBP: ffff88001d369d48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88001f00c000
[   39.317554] R10: ffff88009d369be7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88001d658c00
[   39.317554] R13: ffffffffa0358c70 R14: ffff88001bc5d7c8 R15: 0000000000000000
[   39.317554] FS:  00007f2c4f785760(0000) GS:ffff88001f680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[   39.317554] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[   39.317554] CR2: 00000037e48d7250 CR3: 000000001c0a1000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   39.317554] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[   39.317554] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[   39.317554] Process umount (pid: 2572, threadinfo ffff88001d368000, task ffff88001bf89720)
[   39.317554] Stack:
[   39.317554]  ffff88001d369d78 ffffffffa02f5f59 ffff88001d369d78 ffff88001d658d90
[   39.317554]  ffff88001d658e88 ffffffffa0358c70 ffff88001d369d98 ffffffff81137d46
[   39.317554]  ffff88001d658d90 ffff88001d658d90 ffff88001d369dc8 ffffffff81138230
[   39.317554] Call Trace:
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffffa02f5f59>] xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0xa6/0x122 [xfs]
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff81137d46>] destroy_inode+0x3e/0x58
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff81138230>] evict+0x144/0x14c
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff811383fe>] dispose_list+0x3e/0x4f
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff81138d24>] evict_inodes+0xdb/0xe8
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff81125af0>] generic_shutdown_super+0x4c/0xbb
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff81125b86>] kill_block_super+0x27/0x6a
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff81125eaa>] deactivate_locked_super+0x26/0x57
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff811266f4>] deactivate_super+0x3a/0x3f
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff8113bc88>] mntput_no_expire+0xd0/0xd5
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff8113c90a>] sys_umount+0x2dc/0x30a
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff8112cbb3>] ? path_put+0x22/0x26
[   39.317554]  [<ffffffff814a3342>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[   39.317554] Code: c4 68 5b 41 5c 41 5d c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 66 66 66 66 90 31 c0 48 89 f1 41 89 d0 48 c7 c6 9c e2 35 a0 48 89 fa 31 ff e8 a8 fc ff ff <0f> 0b 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 10 66 66 66 66 90 41 b8 01 00 00 00 
[   39.317554] RIP  [<ffffffffa02f52ea>] assfail+0x22/0x24 [xfs]
[   39.317554]  RSP <ffff88001d369d48>
[   39.388697] ---[ end trace a372bd1f2ffe0ef4 ]---


Thanks
-Wanlong Gao

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:30:42PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> v3.1.0-10325-g3155521

Hmm, this a is a test not run in the auto group.  Do you have tested
it on older kernels where it works, aka do you know if this is a
regresion?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion

[Wanlong Gao]

On 11/13/2011 07:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:30:42PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> v3.1.0-10325-g3155521
> 
> Hmm, this a is a test not run in the auto group.  Do you have tested
> it on older kernels where it works, aka do you know if this is a
> regresion?
> 

No, have not. I'll do it later.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 08:23:56AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 07:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:30:42PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> >> v3.1.0-10325-g3155521
> > 
> > Hmm, this a is a test not run in the auto group.  Do you have tested
> > it on older kernels where it works, aka do you know if this is a
> > regresion?
> > 
> 
> No, have not. I'll do it later.

I can't reproduce it on any of my test setups.  It actually fails on
the 32-bit setups because the large offset writes succeed but the
testcase doesn't expect it, but it doesn't crash the system.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs