From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAEK5vpc235995 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:05:57 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 843D81E9BE22 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:05:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id POnQcbxbRfgQiVad for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:05:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:05:54 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs_getbmap assert Message-ID: <20111114200554.GA21487@infradead.org> References: <20111107103037.GA16213@infradead.org> <20111107201505.GE5534@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111107201505.GE5534@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 07:15:05AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Can you see if that is the case that is being triggered? I've tried to reproduce the issue with additional debugging for almost a week now, but I haven't been able to hit the assert again yet. Which is strange given how often I managed to hit it just before. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs