public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:24:30 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111116232430.GB7046@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111115201426.686729205@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 03:14:09PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> commit 77d7a0c "xfs: Non-blocking inode locking in IO completion" introduced
> a trylocked and defer scheme in xfs_setfilesize to avoid deadlocks when on
> XFS filesystem is used ontop of another using the loop device, and we
> fsync in the loop filesystem.
> 
> Now that we have the cheap enough concurrency managed workqueues, we can
> create per-filesystem instead of global workqueues and remove this scheme
> again, given that it has the potential of delaying size updates and is not
> helpful once we start to log the inode size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

....

>  
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_init_mount_workqueues(
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
> +{
> +	snprintf(mp->m_data_workqueue_name, XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN,
> +		 "xfs-data/%s", mp->m_fsname);
> +	mp->m_data_workqueue =
> +		alloc_workqueue(mp->m_data_workqueue_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
> +	if (!mp->m_data_workqueue)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	snprintf(mp->m_unwritten_workqueue_name, XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN,
> +		 "xfs-conv/%s", mp->m_fsname);
> +	mp->m_unwritten_workqueue =
> +		alloc_workqueue(mp->m_unwritten_workqueue_name,
> +				WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
> +	if (!mp->m_unwritten_workqueue)
> +		goto out_destroy_data_iodone_queue;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_destroy_data_iodone_queue:
> +	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_data_workqueue);
> +out:
> +	return -ENOMEM;
> +#undef XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN

Don't need the undef here anymore as the #define is in the header
file and not local to the function.

> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h	2011-11-10 16:50:40.787796774 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h	2011-11-15 09:15:25.053316473 +0100
> @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
>  	struct shrinker		m_inode_shrink;	/* inode reclaim shrinker */
>  	int64_t			m_low_space[XFS_LOWSP_MAX];
>  						/* low free space thresholds */
> +
> +	struct workqueue_struct	*m_data_workqueue;
> +	struct workqueue_struct	*m_unwritten_workqueue;
> +#define XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN		512
> +	char			m_data_workqueue_name[XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN];
> +	char			m_unwritten_workqueue_name[XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN];
>  } xfs_mount_t;

Can't say I'm a great fan of this - making the workqueue code use
kstrdup() would be a much better better solution, IMO, just like was
done a while for the SLAB cache names to solve exactly the same
problem....

Regardless,

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-16 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-15 20:14 [PATCH 0/5] for-3.2 queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] [PATCH] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 23:15   ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-17  7:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-29 18:48       ` Ben Myers
2011-11-29 18:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-19 17:44   ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 19:01   ` Ben Myers
2011-11-17  7:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 23:24   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-11-17  7:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: do not require an ioend for new EOF calculation Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 18:09   ` Ben Myers
2011-11-16 23:28   ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-08  8:56 [PATCH 0/5] log all file size updates Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-08  8:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-08 23:11   ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-09  7:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-10 17:42       ` Ben Myers
2011-11-14 10:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-14 18:13           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111116232430.GB7046@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox