From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:24:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111116232430.GB7046@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111115201426.686729205@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 03:14:09PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> commit 77d7a0c "xfs: Non-blocking inode locking in IO completion" introduced
> a trylocked and defer scheme in xfs_setfilesize to avoid deadlocks when on
> XFS filesystem is used ontop of another using the loop device, and we
> fsync in the loop filesystem.
>
> Now that we have the cheap enough concurrency managed workqueues, we can
> create per-filesystem instead of global workqueues and remove this scheme
> again, given that it has the potential of delaying size updates and is not
> helpful once we start to log the inode size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
....
>
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_init_mount_workqueues(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp)
> +{
> + snprintf(mp->m_data_workqueue_name, XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN,
> + "xfs-data/%s", mp->m_fsname);
> + mp->m_data_workqueue =
> + alloc_workqueue(mp->m_data_workqueue_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
> + if (!mp->m_data_workqueue)
> + goto out;
> +
> + snprintf(mp->m_unwritten_workqueue_name, XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN,
> + "xfs-conv/%s", mp->m_fsname);
> + mp->m_unwritten_workqueue =
> + alloc_workqueue(mp->m_unwritten_workqueue_name,
> + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
> + if (!mp->m_unwritten_workqueue)
> + goto out_destroy_data_iodone_queue;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_destroy_data_iodone_queue:
> + destroy_workqueue(mp->m_data_workqueue);
> +out:
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +#undef XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN
Don't need the undef here anymore as the #define is in the header
file and not local to the function.
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h 2011-11-10 16:50:40.787796774 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h 2011-11-15 09:15:25.053316473 +0100
> @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
> struct shrinker m_inode_shrink; /* inode reclaim shrinker */
> int64_t m_low_space[XFS_LOWSP_MAX];
> /* low free space thresholds */
> +
> + struct workqueue_struct *m_data_workqueue;
> + struct workqueue_struct *m_unwritten_workqueue;
> +#define XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN 512
> + char m_data_workqueue_name[XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN];
> + char m_unwritten_workqueue_name[XFS_WQ_NAME_LEN];
> } xfs_mount_t;
Can't say I'm a great fan of this - making the workqueue code use
kstrdup() would be a much better better solution, IMO, just like was
done a while for the SLAB cache names to solve exactly the same
problem....
Regardless,
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-16 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-15 20:14 [PATCH 0/5] for-3.2 queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] [PATCH] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 23:15 ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-17 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-29 18:48 ` Ben Myers
2011-11-29 18:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 19:01 ` Ben Myers
2011-11-17 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 23:24 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-11-17 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: do not require an ioend for new EOF calculation Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 18:09 ` Ben Myers
2011-11-16 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-08 8:56 [PATCH 0/5] log all file size updates Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-08 8:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-08 23:11 ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-09 7:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-10 17:42 ` Ben Myers
2011-11-14 10:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-14 18:13 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111116232430.GB7046@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox