public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:25:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111117072543.GA3733@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111116232430.GB7046@dastard>

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:24:30AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Don't need the undef here anymore as the #define is in the header
> file and not local to the function.

I'll fix it up.

> Can't say I'm a great fan of this - making the workqueue code use
> kstrdup() would be a much better better solution, IMO, just like was
> done a while for the SLAB cache names to solve exactly the same
> problem....

Tejun has a patch to make the name argument to alloc_workqueue both
dynamically allocated and varags format.  That'll fix it, but we can't
rely on it yet.  I will switch over to it later in the 3.3 cycle.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-17  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-15 20:14 [PATCH 0/5] for-3.2 queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] [PATCH] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 23:15   ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-17  7:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-29 18:48       ` Ben Myers
2011-11-29 18:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-19 17:44   ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 19:01   ` Ben Myers
2011-11-17  7:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 23:24   ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-17  7:25     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-11-15 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: do not require an ioend for new EOF calculation Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 18:09   ` Ben Myers
2011-11-16 23:28   ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-08  8:56 [PATCH 0/5] log all file size updates Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-08  8:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-08 23:11   ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-09  7:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-10 17:42       ` Ben Myers
2011-11-14 10:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-14 18:13           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111117072543.GA3733@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox