From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAJImWPi075053 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:48:32 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B1B4E1DBED8A for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id iiJKv07dhA4uzdZj for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:48:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:48:30 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS with project quota support in Kernel 2.6.28(.9) Message-ID: <20111119184830.GA14564@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Maarten Vergouwe Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 03:36:51PM +0100, Maarten Vergouwe wrote: > Hi > > I have problems in writes that hang for more than 7 seconds because of the > the kthreadd daemon keeping a mutex locked for too long. > Is there someone who might be able to help me with that? > I saw that a lot of changes were done on the XFS quota support in later > kernels, but the patch list is too long between my kernel and the changed > quota system. Did you manage to check if you can reproduce the issue with a recent kernel? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs