From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAJJ6Vib076699 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:06:31 -0600 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 47AD826527A for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id v6xyB1XOSbDZJOyO for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41872204E1 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:06:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:59:19 -0800 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] XFS update for 3.0-stable Message-ID: <20111119185919.GA30186@kroah.com> References: <20111119181336.964593075@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111119181336.964593075@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 01:13:36PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This is the series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important > enough for 3.0-stable. All but the first three would also be needed > for 3.1-stable, but given the limited resources I plan to concentrate > on 3.0-stable. If anyone wants to take care for 3.1 by building a kernel > with the remaining patches and run QA on them you are more welcome to > help out with that tree. > > Note that while the description of > > xfs: don't serialise direct IO reads on page cache checks > > doesn't mention that is is a regression fix we later noticed that a > large part of the speedups wasn't in fact new, but fixed a performance > regression introduced in Linux 2.6.38 with commit: > > xfs: introduce xfs_rw_lock() helpers for locking the inode Thanks for the series of patches, I'll queue them up after this latest 3.0 release happens on Monday. greg k-h _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs