From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pALAkRi3253559 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:46:27 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D2514162ACF7 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sdAxFXwsKi54keKr for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:46:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:46:25 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion Message-ID: <20111121104625.GA17921@infradead.org> References: <4EBCC112.3020108@cn.fujitsu.com> <20111113115223.GA19435@infradead.org> <4EC05F9C.7030106@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EC05F9C.7030106@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wanlong Gao Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 08:23:56AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > On 11/13/2011 07:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:30:42PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > >> v3.1.0-10325-g3155521 > > > > Hmm, this a is a test not run in the auto group. Do you have tested > > it on older kernels where it works, aka do you know if this is a > > regresion? > > > > No, have not. I'll do it later. I can't reproduce it on any of my test setups. It actually fails on the 32-bit setups because the large offset writes succeed but the testcase doesn't expect it, but it doesn't crash the system. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs