From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAOCr1Rv019571 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:53:01 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8BD0D16DEAA8 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:52:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id xrAY8wM3iFBRqZ3i for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:52:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:52:53 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly Message-ID: <20111124125253.GA26183@infradead.org> References: <1276846374-23916-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20111123143045.GA20892@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: yangguoquan Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, pengxihan@gmail.com On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:29:18PM +0800, yangguoquan wrote: > > I have checked that Linux2.6.35.6 is up-to-date with the issue "xfs: fix untrusted inode number lookup"(you had mentioned in the former reply). > What can I do. > Look forward to your reply. Can you please try a recent kernel (3.0-stable or 3.1)? 2.6.35 is so old that we can't easily support it except for looking over the list of commits. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs