From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	pASDmjhZ236990 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:48:46 -0600
Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2E5804FB6FF
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.26]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id vfr0sQgsCTdDELTE
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6A420468
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:48:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:48:29 +0900
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable
Message-ID: <20111128134829.GC21041@kroah.com>
References: <1322084293-23557-1-git-send-email-bpm@sgi.com>
	<20111128110043.GA13766@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111128110043.GA13766@infradead.org>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:00:43AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:07PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for
> > 3.1-stable.  Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for
> > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1.
> > 
> > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y.  Apologies to those who
> > got this mail twice. 
> 
> The updates looks good to me.

I never saw this series once, can someone please resend them as I don't
see them anywhere.

confused,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs