From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pASGrxc0243781 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:53:59 -0600 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:54:18 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable Message-ID: <20111128165418.GR29840@sgi.com> References: <1322084293-23557-1-git-send-email-bpm@sgi.com> <20111128110043.GA13766@infradead.org> <20111128134829.GC21041@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111128134829.GC21041@kroah.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Greg KH Cc: Christoph Hellwig , stable@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Greg, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:48:29PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:00:43AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:07PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for > > > 3.1-stable. Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for > > > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1. > > > > > > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y. Apologies to those who > > > got this mail twice. > > > > The updates looks good to me. > > I never saw this series once, can someone please resend them as I don't > see them anywhere. The first time I sent this 3.1.y series you were not on the --to=, which is why some people got the series twice but you didn't. Sorry for the confusion. Do you need the series for 3.0 to be resubmitted? Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs