From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:01:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111128180136.GS29840@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111128081925.458494771@bombadil.infradead.org>
Hey Christoph,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:17:33AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> With Dmitrys fsstress updates I've seen very reproducible crashes in
> xfs_attr_shortform_remove because xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit claims that
> the attributes would not fit inline into the inode after removing an
> attribute. It turns out that we were operating on an inode with lots
> of delalloc extents, and thus an if_bytes values for the data fork that
> is larger than biggest possible on-disk storage for it which utterly
> confuses the code near the end of xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit.
>
> Fix this by always allowing the current attribute fork, like we already
> do for the attr1 format, given that delalloc conversion will take care
> for moving either the data or attribute area out of line if it doesn't
> fit at that point - or making the point moot by merging extents at this
> point.
>
> Also document the function better, and clean up some lose bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This is missing some cleanups that you did for v2. I'll use that
version, unless you have an objection.
Thanks,
Ben
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c 2011-11-04 16:31:32.244656675 +0100
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c 2011-11-05 09:01:32.613995075 +0100
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ xfs_attr_namesp_match(int arg_flags, int
> /*
> * Query whether the requested number of additional bytes of extended
> * attribute space will be able to fit inline.
> + *
> * Returns zero if not, else the di_forkoff fork offset to be used in the
> * literal area for attribute data once the new bytes have been added.
> *
> @@ -136,11 +137,26 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit(xfs_inode_t
> return (offset >= minforkoff) ? minforkoff : 0;
> }
>
> - if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_ATTR2)) {
> - if (bytes <= XFS_IFORK_ASIZE(dp))
> - return dp->i_d.di_forkoff;
> + /*
> + * If the requested numbers of bytes is smaller or equal to the
> + * current attribute fork size we can always proceed.
> + *
> + * Note that if_bytes in the data fork might actually be larger than
> + * the current data fork size is due to delalloc extents. In that
> + * case either the extent count will go down when they are converted
> + * to ral extents, or the delalloc conversion will take care of the
> + * literal area rebalancing.
> + */
> + if (bytes <= XFS_IFORK_ASIZE(dp))
> + return dp->i_d.di_forkoff;
> +
> + /*
> + * For attr2 we can try to move the forkoff if there is space in the
> + * literal area, but for the old format we are done if there is no
> + * space in the fixes attribute fork.
> + */
> + if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_ATTR2))
> return 0;
> - }
>
> dsize = dp->i_df.if_bytes;
>
> @@ -157,10 +173,9 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit(xfs_inode_t
> xfs_default_attroffset(dp))
> dsize = XFS_BMDR_SPACE_CALC(MINDBTPTRS);
> break;
> -
> case XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE:
> /*
> - * If have data btree then keep forkoff if we have one,
> + * If have a data btree then keep forkoff if we have one,
> * otherwise we are adding a new attr, so then we set
> * minforkoff to where the btree root can finish so we have
> * plenty of room for attrs
> @@ -168,10 +183,9 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit(xfs_inode_t
> if (dp->i_d.di_forkoff) {
> if (offset < dp->i_d.di_forkoff)
> return 0;
> - else
> - return dp->i_d.di_forkoff;
> - } else
> - dsize = XFS_BMAP_BROOT_SPACE(dp->i_df.if_broot);
> + return dp->i_d.di_forkoff;
> + }
> + dsize = XFS_BMAP_BROOT_SPACE(dp->i_df.if_broot);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -186,10 +200,10 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit(xfs_inode_t
> maxforkoff = XFS_LITINO(mp) - XFS_BMDR_SPACE_CALC(MINABTPTRS);
> maxforkoff = maxforkoff >> 3; /* rounded down */
>
> - if (offset >= minforkoff && offset < maxforkoff)
> - return offset;
> if (offset >= maxforkoff)
> return maxforkoff;
> + if (offset >= minforkoff)
> + return offset;
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 8:17 [PATCH 0/4] xfs fixes for Linux 3.2-rc3 Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 18:01 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2011-11-28 18:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: validate acl count Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: force buffer writeback before blocking on the ilock in inode reclaim Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 8:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix the logspace waiting algorithm Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-30 23:56 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-01 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 19:51 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-02 11:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-05 2:53 ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-05 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 18:32 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-01 20:43 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-12-01 19:28 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-12-02 11:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-02 16:02 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2011-11-29 19:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] xfs fixes for Linux 3.2-rc3 Ben Myers
2011-11-30 8:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-30 8:58 ` [PATCH 5/4] xfs: fix nfs export of 64-bit inodes numbers on 32-bit kernels Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-02 16:07 ` Ben Myers
2011-12-02 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-06 16:39 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111128180136.GS29840@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox