From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pASLqaJD257037 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:52:37 -0600 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A192619E276C for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:43:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id k7DphGgEAFdwk8mD for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:43:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554E321155 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:43:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:40:18 +0900 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable Message-ID: <20111128214018.GB1650@kroah.com> References: <1322084293-23557-1-git-send-email-bpm@sgi.com> <20111128110043.GA13766@infradead.org> <20111128134829.GC21041@kroah.com> <20111128165418.GR29840@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111128165418.GR29840@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Christoph Hellwig , stable@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:54:18AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Greg, > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:48:29PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:00:43AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:07PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for > > > > 3.1-stable. Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for > > > > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1. > > > > > > > > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y. Apologies to those who > > > > got this mail twice. > > > > > > The updates looks good to me. > > > > I never saw this series once, can someone please resend them as I don't > > see them anywhere. > > The first time I sent this 3.1.y series you were not on the --to=, which > is why some people got the series twice but you didn't. Sorry for the > confusion. Was stable@vger.kernel.org on the to: line? If so, I should have seen them through that, but I don't, which is worrysome to me. > Do you need the series for 3.0 to be resubmitted? The 3.0 series is already in the last 3.0.11 release, so I don't need them, I think I need the 3.1 patches, right? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs