public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* best stable recent kernel?
@ 2011-11-28 21:31 Paul Anderson
  2011-11-28 22:09 ` Emmanuel Florac
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Anderson @ 2011-11-28 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs-oss

I need to start deploying some large XFS based fileservers servers and
wish to try a kernel newer than what we've been using (2.6.38.5 from
kernel.org).

We've stayed at 2.6.38.5 for awhile, but have had metadata loss on
many shutdowns, clean or not.  We've found 0 length files where the
files had been written and closed long before the crash - in some
cases we were careful sync by hand, wait for quiescent drives, then
clean reboot, etc.  This sounds related to a series of commits that
indicates some workarounds and fixes in the time frame of 2.6.38.5 to
3.0 (how completely this particular problem was fixed, I don't know).

Several past threads here on this list have described these servers,
but they are 126 2TB drive RAID 60 used for mostly genetic sequencing
data.

Christoph recently suggested here in another xfs developer list thread:

"I've also backported it to the 3.0-stable issues.  I would recommend
to upgrade to the latest Linux 3.0-stable release, as I'll plan to
backport all important XFS fixes to it."

Is this a decent target for us to try?  We're looking for the best XFS
and NFS stability that is practical.

Thanks,

Paul Anderson
University of Michigan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: best stable recent kernel?
  2011-11-28 21:31 best stable recent kernel? Paul Anderson
@ 2011-11-28 22:09 ` Emmanuel Florac
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emmanuel Florac @ 2011-11-28 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Anderson; +Cc: xfs-oss

Le Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:31:42 -0500 vous écriviez:

> I need to start deploying some large XFS based fileservers servers and
> wish to try a kernel newer than what we've been using (2.6.38.5 from
> kernel.org).

I'm happy with the 3.0 series. Right now I'm still mostly running
3.0.4, and I had no trouble at all (machines from 30 to 120 TB mostly).
2.6.28 never cut it for me, went from 2.6.35 to 3.0. Right now 3.1
seems OK but it's certainly a bit too fresh.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@intellique.com>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-28 22:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-28 21:31 best stable recent kernel? Paul Anderson
2011-11-28 22:09 ` Emmanuel Florac

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox