From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pATItHmO090256 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:55:17 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:55:12 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [PATCH] xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert Message-ID: <20111129185512.GA16435@infradead.org> References: <20111115201407.038216766@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111115201426.498870090@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111116231517.GA7046@dastard> <20111117073004.GB3733@infradead.org> <20111129184816.GV29840@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111129184816.GV29840@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:48:16PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > FYI, Test 117 also hit it for me after I backed off 'freeze fsstress > options'. Are you still planning on adding a copy of the test with the > seeds in question? Yes. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs