From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pATJMfcD092917 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:22:41 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:23:00 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] xfs fixes for Linux 3.2-rc3 Message-ID: <20111129192300.GW29840@sgi.com> References: <20111128081732.350228200@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111128081732.350228200@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:17:32AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > These are the patches that I think should still go into Linux 3.2. > > The first two are fairly trivial fixes for crashes that can be reproduced > by users action or filesystem corruption. The third is a a fix for the > hang reported by Simon, and although he hasn't tested the final variant > yet I'm fairly confident it should fix it given we use the same pattern > for dquots. Yep. > The last one is the biggest and fixes the log space hang > first reported by Alex and then debugged by Chandra. This last one is pretty big. Could it wait for 3.3? -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs