From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAUNuLoD222699 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:56:21 -0600 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:56:41 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix the logspace waiting algorithm Message-ID: <20111130235641.GX29840@sgi.com> References: <20111128081732.350228200@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111128081925.981681380@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111128081925.981681380@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph, I feel that the ordering of the accesses to l_grant_head and the writeq list may be important in the lockless path, and notice that they used to be in opposite order. It could use a comment explaining why (if) it is ok. -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs