From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pB55LLDE112463 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 23:21:22 -0600 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 41B6C29A167 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:21:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 2opgHkDJv5fRWd7a for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:21:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:18:43 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] xfs: simplify xfs_qm_detach_gdquots Message-ID: <20111205051843.GS7046@dastard> References: <20111128082722.604873274@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111128082838.328519173@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111128082838.328519173@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:27:34AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > With the new lock order there is no reason to drop qi_dqlist_lock around > calls to xfs_qm_dqrele. .... because the free list lock now nests inside the qi_dqlist_lock and the dquot lock. > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs