From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pB6H5Tff243855 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:05:29 -0600 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:05:51 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable (again) Message-ID: <20111206170551.GQ29840@sgi.com> References: <1322782064-1723-1-git-send-email-bpm@sgi.com> <20111201233302.GA5573@kroah.com> <20111202231219.GA6016@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111202231219.GA6016@kroah.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Greg KH Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Greg, On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 03:12:19PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:33:02PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:27:38PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for > > > 3.1-stable. Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for > > > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1. > > > > > > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y. I've been having trouble > > > getting mail out to stable@vger, but it seems to be working now. Apologies to > > > those who are getting this mail yet again. > > > > Nice, I got all of these, thanks. I'll queue them up in a few days when > > I get caught up on the stable patch queue. > > All applied. Great! ;) > Any reason why you only signed off on the last patch, and not the others > you sent me? Just curious. I forgot to sign off on the rest. I'll remember next time. Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs