From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pBEMDC8f232972 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:13:12 -0600 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:13:36 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [patch 11/19] xfs: implement lazy removal for the dquot freelist Message-ID: <20111214221336.GD29840@sgi.com> References: <20111206215806.844405397@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111206215854.567573800@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111206215854.567573800@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 04:58:17PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Do not remove dquots from the freelist when we grab a reference to them in > xfs_qm_dqlookup, but leave them on the freelist util scanning notices that > they have a reference. This speeds up the lookup fastpath, and greatly > simplifies the lock ordering constraints. Note that the same scheme is > used by the VFS inode and dentry caches. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs