From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pBF3D5UN244893 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:13:05 -0600 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:13:33 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [patch 12/19] xfs: flatten the dquot lock ordering Message-ID: <20111215031333.GG29840@sgi.com> References: <20111206215806.844405397@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111206215854.769664827@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111206215854.769664827@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 04:58:18PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c > =================================================================== > @@ -781,11 +787,7 @@ xfs_qm_dqget( > return (EIO); > } > } > -#endif > > - again: > - > -#ifdef DEBUG Meant to say... moving the goto tag below doesn't look like it was strictly necessary, but it didn't look like it was possible to get here without the ilock held anyway. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs