From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q0CB5TZO248603 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:05:30 -0600 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:05:23 -0200 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 278: Ensure lost+found is not created with wrong link count (V3) Message-ID: <20120112110523.GA1798@andromeda.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1326288901-8171-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> <4F0E0A19.6020305@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F0E0A19.6020305@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > >+xfs_repair $SCRATCH_DEV&>> $seq.full > > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely > > As mentioned before, &>> does not work on bash 3.x, the test looks good. > Yes, Mark and I discussed about it, but, since the patch is going upstream, I thought would be better to leave it as-is, once most newer distros are using bash 4, but, I have no concerns in change it if needed. Cheers -- --Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs