From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q0CDDEqS257434 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:13:15 -0600 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:13:08 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 278: Ensure lost+found is not created with wrong link count (V3) Message-ID: <20120112131308.GA24842@infradead.org> References: <1326288901-8171-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> <4F0E0A19.6020305@sgi.com> <20120112110523.GA1798@andromeda.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120112110523.GA1798@andromeda.usersys.redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Carlos Maiolino Cc: Mark Tinguely , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:05:23AM -0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > >+xfs_repair $SCRATCH_DEV&>> $seq.full > > > > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely > > > > As mentioned before, &>> does not work on bash 3.x, the test looks good. > > > Yes, Mark and I discussed about it, but, since the patch is going upstream, I > thought would be better to leave it as-is, once most newer distros are using > bash 4, but, I have no concerns in change it if needed. xfstests should work on all sorts of distros. Please resend it without that operator. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs