public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: jeff.liu@oracle.com, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Introduce SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE to XFS V5
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:39:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120112173959.GU20739@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112164148.GB22223@infradead.org>

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:41:48AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:01:48AM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> > >Sorry, am was well understood your opinions in this point for now.
> > >IMHO, we can only find and return the data buffer offset at a dirty or
> > >unwritten page once the first page was probed.
> > >
> > 
> > From my tests, xfs_bmapi_read() can only find holes if they cross or
> > start on a 64KB boundary. It would be nice if unwritten extents were
> > at least that good at finding holes.
> 
> Are you testing on ia64 with 64k blocks? :)  xfs_bmapi_read will
> find holes down to block granularity, that's how it's implemented.
> However recent XFS does fairly aggressive preallocation, so you probably
						^^^^
					       
it is speculative delay in this case, I think.

-Ben

> won't find small holes unless you explicitly punch them out using
> XFS_IOC_UNRESVSP or fallocate with the hole punch flag.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-12 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-06 13:28 Introduce SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE to XFS V5 Jeff Liu
2012-01-10 17:18 ` Ben Myers
2012-01-11  5:45   ` Jeff Liu
2012-01-11 21:06     ` Mark Tinguely
2012-01-12 16:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-12 17:50         ` Ben Myers
2012-01-11 21:07     ` Mark Tinguely
2012-01-12 13:29       ` Jeff Liu
2012-01-12 16:39       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-13  2:14         ` Jeff Liu
2012-01-11 21:12     ` Mark Tinguely
2012-01-12 13:52       ` Jeff Liu
2012-01-12 15:01         ` Mark Tinguely
2012-01-12 16:41           ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-12 17:39             ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-01-13  2:41           ` Jeff Liu
2012-01-11 15:43 ` Ben Myers
2012-01-11 22:28   ` Ben Myers
2012-01-12 13:21     ` Jeff Liu
2012-01-12 12:53   ` Jeff Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120112173959.GU20739@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox