From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q17FNb3a236315 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:23:37 -0600 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:23:38 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] better dquot caching Message-ID: <20120207152338.GE8262@sgi.com> References: <20120201135719.202171828@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120207073009.GM13095@sgi.com> <20120207132452.GA1692@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120207132452.GA1692@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:24:52AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:30:09AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > These conflict with Chandra's project quota patches. I've started > > looking at them again, but I am a little uncomfortable with the change > > to the superblock... could I get your opinion of that while I take a > > look at these? > > Can you review patch 1 for now as that's a 3.3 candidate. I'll rebase > the rest on top his changes later. Sounds reasonable. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs