From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q184Ehfd033358 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:14:43 -0600 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id aomz3q4xxt1gJTDT for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:14:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:14:40 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 068: run fsstress in read/write mode Message-ID: <20120208041440.GD20305@dastard> References: <4F315F88.3020200@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F315F88.3020200@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Jan Kara , xfs-oss On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:29:44AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Jan Kara was testing filesystem freeze, and was consistently locking > up, although my tests of 068 were passing. He pointed out that > he was running in read/write mode, and it was atime updates causing > the trouble. Sure enough, dropping "-w" from fsstress locked me up > too. Change this so we get better (and more realistic) coverage. Good idea. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs