From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1DI2N7j029506 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:02:23 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id AVapgzmVak307Avn (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:02:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:02:20 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ? Message-ID: <20120213180220.GA24163@infradead.org> References: <4F394116.8080200@cape-horn-eng.com> <20120213170825.GA7197@infradead.org> <4F394442.9020307@cape-horn-eng.com> <20120213171556.GA13449@infradead.org> <4F3947D6.5060402@cape-horn-eng.com> <20120213172937.GA25248@infradead.org> <4F394E10.9000804@cape-horn-eng.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F394E10.9000804@cape-horn-eng.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Richard Ems Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:53:20PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote: > I will try to install a > 3.2 kernel and will create new XFS partitions > with "-i size=1024", since we use ACLs a lot for user access. > Is there a chance to change existing XFS partitions to "-i size=1024" ? Unfortunately not. Note that the speedups in 3.2 only matter for out of line attributes - once you store the ACLs inside the inode the code that makes it dog slow in old kernels is never used. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs