From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Richard Ems <richard.ems@cape-horn-eng.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:16:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120213211654.GA20192@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F395B1A.7010709@cape-horn-eng.com>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:48:58PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote:
> I already updated to 3.2.4 and started the same "find dir" command again
> that previously took 100 min to run. It has been running now for over 30
> min ...
>
> Should this "find" run time also improve ?
No, not by that change anyway.
> Or will only unlink run time improve ?
Yes.
> Do I have to mount the XFS partition with some new/old/special option?
I'd have to look into it in more detail. IIRC you said you're using
RAID6 which can be fairly nasty for small reads. Did you use the
inode64 mount option on the filesystem?
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-13 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 16:57 XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ? Richard Ems
2012-02-13 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 17:11 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 17:26 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 17:53 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 18:06 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 18:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 18:18 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 18:48 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 21:16 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2012-02-14 5:31 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-14 9:48 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 19:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-14 9:49 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 10:54 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 11:44 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 0:09 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-14 12:32 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 19:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-15 12:07 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-15 1:27 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-15 12:07 ` Richard Ems
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-14 13:02 Richard Ems
[not found] ` <4F3AA191.9030606@mnsu.edu>
2012-02-14 18:12 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-15 12:48 ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 23:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-15 15:54 ` Richard Ems
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120213211654.GA20192@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.ems@cape-horn-eng.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox