From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1EJ7wvh117975 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:07:59 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id wXFiOiMp29BmYVvu (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:07:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:07:53 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ? Message-ID: <20120214190753.GA8383@infradead.org> References: <4F3A5B49.6020803@cape-horn-eng.com> <4F3AA191.9030606@mnsu.edu> <4F3AA40D.50302@cape-horn-eng.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F3AA40D.50302@cape-horn-eng.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Richard Ems Cc: Jeffrey Hundstad , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote: > # /net/c3m/usr/local/software/XFS/summarise_stat.pl /bin/ > 9 6.2% are scripts (shell, perl, whatever) > 65 44.8% don't use any stat() family calls at all > 61 42.1% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only > 9 6.2% use 64-bit stat64() family interfaces only > 1 0.7% use both 32-bit and 64-bit stat() family interfaces > > So I was not sure if I should use inode64 or not. Are you on a 32-bit system (userspace, kernel doesn't matter)? If the system is 64-bit even the plain stat handles 64-bit inodes just fine. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs