From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1F1WMLe139725 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:32:22 -0600 Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oMxcCaBA25hJDXYy for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:32:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:32:17 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfs_fsr (defragmenting) 'XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=xxxxxx: Invalid argument' error Message-ID: <20120215013217.GK14132@dastard> References: <4F3AAC04.5090400@rhul.ac.uk> <20120215002811.GM7479@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120215002811.GM7479@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Tom Crane Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:28:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg09736.html Well, that shows how slow the XFS mailing list can be at times. I found Eric's reply in this thread in an internet archive via google before it arrived in my inbox. IOWs, the the mail archive site received it, published it and google crawled it before the XFS list finished distributing the mail to all recipiants.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs