public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
To: Bernhard Schrader <bernhard.schrader@innogames.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Problems with filesizes on different Kernels
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:33:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120217123335.GA9671@citd.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3E3F5A.9000202@innogames.de>

On 17.02.2012 12:51, Bernhard Schrader wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we just discovered a problem, which I think is related to XFS. Well,
> I will try to explain.
> 
> The environment i am working with are around 300 Postgres databases
> in separated VM's. All are running with XFS. Differences are just in
> kernel versions.
> - 2.6.18
> - 2.6.39
> - 3.1.4
> 
> Some days ago i discovered that the file nodes of my postgresql
> tables have strange sizes. They are located in
> /var/lib/postgresql/9.0/main/base/[databaseid]/
> If I execute the following commands i get results like this:
> 
> Command: du -sh | tr "\n" " "; du --apparent-size -h
> Result: 6.6G	. 5.7G	.

Since a few kernel-version XFS does speculative preallocations, which is 
primarily a measure to prevent fragmentation.

The preallocations should go away when you drop the caches.

sync
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

XFS can be prevented to do that with the mount-option "allocsize". 
Personally i use "allocsize=64k", since i first encountered that 
behaviour, my workload primarily consists of single-thread writing which 
doesn't benefit from this preallocation.
Your workload OTOH may benefit as it should prevent/lower the 
fragmentation of the database files.






Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-17 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-17 11:51 Problems with filesizes on different Kernels Bernhard Schrader
2012-02-17 12:33 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer [this message]
2012-02-20  8:41   ` Bernhard Schrader
2012-02-20 11:06     ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-20 12:06       ` Bernhard Schrader
2012-02-27  8:23         ` Bernhard Schrader

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120217123335.GA9671@citd.de \
    --to=ms@citd.de \
    --cc=bernhard.schrader@innogames.de \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox