From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1HHmHA1100002 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:48:17 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id G3Ypw58MZPimjN1A (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:48:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:48:14 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: use per-CPU data for the quota statistics Message-ID: <20120217174814.GE21796@infradead.org> References: <20120215022926.577682146@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120215023147.414783335@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120215235929.GP14132@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120215235929.GP14132@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:59:29AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Why not just make val a 64bit value so overflow is simply not an > issue? It's a 1:1 copy an paste from the normal XFS stats. But thinking about this copy and paste is bad - I'll rework this to add the quota stats that we keep into the normal XFS stats, and just provide the two old quota stats files as legacy views into them. That way we'll have only a single copy of that code. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs