From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1JLH9jm027404 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:17:09 -0600 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:17:06 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch 00/12] log grant code cleanups Message-ID: <20120219211706.GB22831@infradead.org> References: <20111212141346.986825692@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120216214609.GB7762@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120216214609.GB7762@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:46:09PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Christoph, > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:13:47AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This series removes the opportunistic log space wakeups which had no > > use but hiding real races for far too long, and applies various bits > > of refactoring to the log grant code to make it smaller and more readable. > > This patch set looks just about ready to go. The only changes I'd like > to see are some commit messages where they are missing, and I have a > question about patch 11 related to usage t_ocnt on the log ticket. For the "share ..." commits I can't really think of any commit message that actually makes sense - the subject seems to describe what the patch does more than enough. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs