From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1KMFCHx113499 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:15:12 -0600 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id dkJMlFt7Nhvq1Q8Q for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:15:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:15:09 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfs: remove the per-filesystem list of dquots Message-ID: <20120220221509.GE3592@dastard> References: <20120220022815.018921977@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120220022904.615605871@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120220022904.615605871@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:28:22PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Instead of keeping a separate per-filesystem list of dquots we can walk > the radix tree for the two places where we need to iterate all quota > structures. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Still a bit of a lookup vs iterate hold-off remaining, but I think we can live with the reduction now. If it proves to be a noticable problem then we can look towards RCU based lookups, I think. Otherwise it looks OK to me. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs