From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>,
Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com>,
Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [patch 1/1] xfstests: update inode softlimit output in 050
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:27:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120222182832.076759206@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120222182713.040087240@sgi.com
[-- Attachment #1: xfstests-fix-050-after-20f12d8 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1927 bytes --]
With Mitsuo Hayasaka's kernel patch "xfs: change available ranges of softlimit
and hardlimit in quota check", xfs quota behavior is slightly different.
This needs to be reflected in test 050. The new behavior is that we only start
the timer when we're above soft inode quota, and we don't start the timer when
we're at or below.
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Index: xfstests/050.out
===================================================================
--- xfstests.orig/050.out
+++ xfstests/050.out
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rte
*** push past the soft block limit
[ROOT] 0 0 0 00 [--------] 3 0 0 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
-[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [7 days] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
+[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
*** push past the hard inode limit (expect EDQUOT)
[ROOT] 0 0 0 00 [--------] 3 0 0 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rte
*** push past the soft block limit
[ROOT] 0 0 0 00 [--------] 3 0 0 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
-[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [7 days] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
+[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
*** push past the hard inode limit (expect EDQUOT)
[ROOT] 0 0 0 00 [--------] 3 0 0 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rte
*** push past the soft block limit
[ROOT] 0 0 0 00 [--------] 3 0 0 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
-[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [7 days] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
+[NAME] 140 100 500 00 [7 days] 4 4 10 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
*** push past the hard inode limit (expect EDQUOT)
[ROOT] 0 0 0 00 [--------] 3 0 0 00 [--------] 0 0 0 00 [--------]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 18:27 [patch 0/1] xfstests: fix test 050 Ben Myers
2012-02-22 18:27 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-03-08 22:42 ` [patch 1/1] xfstests: update inode softlimit output in 050 Eric Sandeen
2012-03-09 2:17 ` Ben Myers
2012-03-31 20:12 ` [patch 1/1] 050: update inode softlimit output Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120222182832.076759206@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox