From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1OGKRve064022 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:20:27 -0600 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (mondschein.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id l24VEIH29fHHMZ1O for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:20:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from merkaba.localnet (ppp-93-104-130-114.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.130.114]) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0ED2FB4 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:20:24 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: creating a new 80 TB XFS Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:20:23 +0100 References: <4F478818.4050803@cape-horn-eng.com> <20120224150805.243e4906@harpe.intellique.com> <4F47B020.4000202@cape-horn-eng.com> (sfid-20120224_171032_352286_A09775B9) In-Reply-To: <4F47B020.4000202@cape-horn-eng.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201202241720.23581.Martin@lichtvoll.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2012 schrieb Richard Ems: > >> MOUNT > >> On mount I will use the options > >> > >> mount -o noatime,nobarrier,nofail,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,inode64 > >> /dev/sdX1 /mount_point > > > > > > > > I think that the logbufs/logbsize option matches the default here. > > Use delaylog if applicable. See the xfs FAQ. > > Yes, if I trust the mount manual page, it states "The default value is > 8 buffers for any recent kernel." . I suppose 3.2.6 is "a recent > kernel", so this could be avoided, but having it explicitly on the > mkfs.xfs line does not hurt, or? > And for logbsize: "The default value for any recent kernel is 32768." > > But then at the end of the manual page for mount it says "December > 2004", so how actual is this information? Can the default mount values > be shown by running mount with some verbose and dry-run parameters? Does cat /proc/mounts show them? /proc/mounts is more detailed than mount or mount -l. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs