From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1R1xbni012796 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:59:37 -0600 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:59:41 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfs: merge xfs_qm_export_dquot into xfs_qm_scall_getquota Message-ID: <20120227015941.GI7762@sgi.com> References: <20120220022815.018921977@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120220022903.488870885@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120220022903.488870885@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Christoph, On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:28:16PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The is no good reason to have these two separate, and for the next change > we would need the full struct xfs_dquot in xfs_qm_export_dquot, so better > just fold the code now instead of changing it spuriously. > > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig I should have replied to this patch, not the older rev. I have a question about the error code, now we're not mapping errors to EFAULT and we used do... which is correct? Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs