From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1RHN57S107943 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:23:05 -0600 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:23:10 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfs: merge xfs_qm_export_dquot into xfs_qm_scall_getquota Message-ID: <20120227172310.GH28391@sgi.com> References: <20120220022815.018921977@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120220022903.488870885@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120227015941.GI7762@sgi.com> <20120227171727.GA22046@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120227171727.GA22046@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:17:27PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I should have replied to this patch, not the older rev. > > > > I have a question about the error code, now we're not mapping errors to > > EFAULT and we used do... which is correct? > > The old one looks finshy, but we even if we changed it it should be > in a separate patch with a good description. I'll resend with this bit > fixed. Sounds great. ;) -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs