From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1S8XDm6169671 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:33:14 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 38DuGpedB509BEOy (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:33:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:33:08 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS status update for January 2012 Message-ID: <20120228083308.GA22995@infradead.org> References: <20120225120216.GA21721@infradead.org> <4F4B5CB3.8090107@cape-horn-eng.com> <4F4B7408.8020706@waagmeester.co.za> <4F4B7CB1.50102@cape-horn-eng.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F4B7CB1.50102@cape-horn-eng.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Richard Ems Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote: > On 02/27/2012 01:16 PM, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > > Hello Richard, > > > > Here I am running gentoo with kernel 3.2 > > In the 2.6 era I always mounted my xfs file systems with the delaylog > > option, is this still necessary? Is delaylog now default? > > Hi Coert, > > I am running now 3.2.7 and the output of " grep xfs /proc/mounts " shows > delaylog as being in use. I didn't put this option in /etc/fstab, so I > think it must be default now. > > But surely a developer can give a much better answer to your question. Delaylog has been the default since Linux 2.6.39. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs