From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1SAB9SR173794 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:11:09 -0600 Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id xfRhEu440hM4fgAD (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:11:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:11:05 +0100 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: Warning from unlock_new_inode Message-ID: <20120228101105.GA4125@quack.suse.cz> References: <20120222220137.GB3650@quack.suse.cz> <20120228083444.GB22995@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120228083444.GB22995@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jan Kara , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue 28-02-12 03:34:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:01:37PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hello, > > > > while running fsstress on XFS partition with 3.3-rc4 kernel + my freeze > > fixes (they do not touch anything relevant AFAICT) I've got the following > > warning: > > That's stressing including freezes or without? Do you have a better > description of te workload? It was: ~/tests/xfstests-dev/ltp/fsstress -d /mnt -n 10000 -p 4 while doing in parallel while true; do freeze; sync; unfreeze; sleep 4; done > Either way it's an odd one, I can't see any obvious way how this would > happen. Yeah, and I never seen it again although I was stressing the filesystem for quite a long time. So I think we can put this off for now. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs