From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q218a6U1093993 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:36:06 -0600 Received: from busoni.debian.org (busoni.debian.org [140.211.15.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id alP21istvvAqv3tw (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:36:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:33:45 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: <20120301083345.GA24409@infradead.org> References: <20120301081409.3103.43155.reportbug@frosties.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120301081409.3103.43155.reportbug@frosties.localnet> Reply-To: Christoph Hellwig , 661580@bugs.debian.org List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Goswin von Brederlow , 661580@bugs.debian.org On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > And I can confirm that the sector size detection is still broken in > 3.1.7. That's a known bug that Carlos wanted to look into. If you really can't accept smaller I/O without major pain make sure to use a larger logical blocksize, which should be handled fine by everything. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs