From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q23BiHOo021913 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 05:44:17 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id g3Ul3jitKn37Jc1i (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 03:44:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 06:44:13 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: bp->b_bn != XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL, file: fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c, line: 598 Message-ID: <20120303114413.GA18748@infradead.org> References: <1330539626.7615.73.camel@utemp.mieszkanie> <20120302104348.GA22230@infradead.org> <1330774627.32457.24.camel@utemp.mieszkanie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1330774627.32457.24.camel@utemp.mieszkanie> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Rafa?? Kupka Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:37:07PM +0100, Rafa?? Kupka wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 05:43 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hello, > > > From the trace this looks like we got incorrect results from xfs_imap, > > which got some fairly significant changes between the two kernels > > you tested. Can you check if 2.6.36 shows this issue? It's the first > > kernel that had these big changes in inode lookup. > > I've tested more kernels and here are results (linus git tree, no > additional patches): > - v2.6.36 -- good > - v2.6.38 -- good > - v2.6.39 -- bad, I/O error log entry and locked processes: > - git revision 243b422af9ea9af4ead07a8ad54c90d4f9b6081a -- good > It's one patch before "xfs: preallocation transactions do not need to be synchronous" > > - git revision c5850150d0b9ae16840c5d9846f9d5a759996a15: > Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs > > * 'for-linus' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs: > xfs: stop using the page cache to back the buffer cache > xfs: register the inode cache shrinker before quotachecks > xfs: xfs_trans_read_buf() should return an error on failure This is the only patch in that area. Give me a bit more time to figure out how it could related to your issues. > Hung xfsdump (only?) without any additional log entries > (CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is set): > I don't know if it's the same bug - there is no assertion nor I/O error > log entry... It's the same code path at least.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs