From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q282ewQm195438 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:40:59 -0600 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FuVAc6zYay5Vs0fU for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:40:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:40:53 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: XFS filesystem setfacl has limitation? Message-ID: <20120308024053.GN3592@dastard> References: <4F56C4D5.1070206@eisoo.com> <20120307044242.GJ3592@dastard> <20120307221613.1014ea82@galadriel.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120307221613.1014ea82@galadriel.home> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:16:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:42:42 +1100 vous =E9criviez: > = > > It's basically a limitation of the on-disk format definition that > > has been carried over from Irix. It is an arbitrary limit - the real > > limit is the maximum size of an attribute (64KB) and we plan to > > raise it to that limit as part of the upcoming on-disk format > > changes for metadata checksums... > > = > = > What's the proposed time frame or kernel version for this change? When it is ready. Think months, not years ;) Cheers, Dave. -- = Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs