From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q28Ie2Mj055956 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:40:02 -0600 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:40:09 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfs: split in-core and on-disk inode log item fields Message-ID: <20120308184009.GU7762@sgi.com> References: <20120229095347.009884687@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120229095509.376594756@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120229095509.376594756@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:53:54AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Add a new ili_fields member to the inode log item to isolate the in-memory > flags from the ones that actually go to the log. This will allow tracking > timestamp-only updates for fdatasync and O_DSYNC in the next patch and > prepares for divorcing the on-disk log format from the in-memory log item > a little further down the road. > > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig You were careful to update ilf_fields in xfs_inode_item_format... Looks good. Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs