From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q2HMYxg4130927 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:34:59 -0500 Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id XRXaraMwAlsXmQOh for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:34:54 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: NOW:Peter goading Dave over delaylog - WAS: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier Message-ID: <20120317223454.GQ5091@dastard> References: <4F61803A.60009@hardwarefreak.com> <20321.63389.586851.689070@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> <4F64115D.50208@hardwarefreak.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F64115D.50208@hardwarefreak.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stan Hoeppner Cc: Peter Grandi , Linux fs XFS On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:21:49PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > I'm guessing either Dave chose not to take your bait, or simply didn't > read your message. If the former this thread will likely die now. If > the latter, and Dave decides to respond, I'm grabbing some popcorn, a > beer, and a lawn chair. ;) Just ignore the troll, Stan. I've got code to write and bugs to fix - I don't have time to waste on irrelevant semantic arguments about the definition of "performance optimisation" for improvements that are done, dusted and widely deployed. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs