From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q2QHn2KQ044957 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:49:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:49:14 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] repair: fix the variable-width nlink array Message-ID: <20120326174914.GR8451@sgi.com> References: <20120228174223.GA6148@infradead.org> <20120301212822.GM7762@sgi.com> <20120302074433.GA4117@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120302074433.GA4117@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Christoph, On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:44:33AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:28:22PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > On my machine test 030 has regressed. It passed on 3.1.7. > > That's an older change. I have a fix in my local tree, but it needs > polishing so that it still works with older repair versions. Have you had a chance to work on your fix for 030? Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs