From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q2R1Iwqk141777 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:18:58 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id h473nSGxXdEaFnAj for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:18:34 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 235: do smaller test IO Message-ID: <20120327011834.GT5091@dastard> References: <4F70C3D9.80708@redhat.com> <20120326220926.GO5091@dastard> <4F70EBD8.9030006@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F70EBD8.9030006@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eryu Guan , xfs-oss On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:21:12PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/26/12 5:09 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:30:33PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> Test 235 fails on ext2/ext3 with 1024 fs block size because a > >> 16k write uses an extra metadata block. If we do a smaller write > >> this won't happen. > > ..... > >> > >> -$XFS_IO_PROG -F -c 'pwrite 0 16k' -c 'fsync' \ > >> +$XFS_IO_PROG -F -c 'pwrite 0 8k' -c 'fsync' \ > > > > So now it fails only on 512 byte block size filesystems? > > ext[23] don't do 512 byte block filesystems, so no. ;) Oh, I forgot about that. Well, just ignore me. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs